Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management <p>The Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management (APJHM) is a peer-reviewed journal for managers of organisations offering healthcare and aged care services. The APJHM aims to promote the discipline of health management throughout the region by facilitating the transfer of knowledge among readers by widening the evidence base for management practices.<br /><br />*Print 1(1);2006 - 5(1);2010 Online 4(2);2009 - current<br />*ISSN 2204-3136 (online); ISSN 1833-3818 (print)</p> Australasian College of Health Service Management en-US Asia Pacific Journal of Health Management 1833-3818 The Relationship Between Workload and MSDs Among Chicken Farmers: Body Mass Index <p>Farming is generally recognized as a hazardous occupation, as reported by numerous occupational accidents and health problems such as Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs). This study aims to determine the relationship between body mass index and workload with complaints of MSDs among broiler chicken workers in Eastern Indonesia. We used a cross-sectional study approach to obtain research findings. Sixty respondents were involved in this study. They filled out three questionnaires that had been tested for validity and reliability. Fur-thermore, the collected data were analyzed using a bivariate test to interpret the research findings. The results showed that there was no relationship between Body Mass Index (p= 0.446) and workload (p= 0.800) with complaints of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) among the workers. Further, we also found no relationship between Body Mass Index and workload with complaints of Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs) among workers). It is recommended that chicken workers stretch the muscles before and after working and always meet the nutritional needs to keep the body's metabolic system working properly</p> Suharni Fachrin Samsualam Alfina Baharuddin Copyright (c) 17 3 Reflective Case Discussion (RCD) to enchance Skill conceptual, Critical thinking and Nursing Knowledge: A Systematic Review <p><em>Objective:</em> the systematic review aims to identify the benefits of conducting reflective case discussions (RCD) in improving skills, critical thinking and knowledge of nurses</p> <p><em>Method:</em> This systematic review uses the PRISMA Guideline checklist. Articles were searched through several databases, namely Scopus, Pubmed, Proquest and Science Direct. Article quality is assessed by the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP)</p> <p><em>Result:</em> It was found that there were 8 articles for RCD in which the setting are in the clinical hospital.</p> <p><em>Conclusion:</em> RCD improves the skills, critical thinking and nurses’ knowledge. This is also related to their professionalism in serving patients. RCD also prevents repeated mistakes and increases collaboration between nurse colleagues.</p> Haeril Amir Rahmat Hidayat Al Ihksan Agus Copyright (c) 17 3